That is to say, most of the inmates had not actually committed any action against the regime. Friedrich and Brzezinski explicitly reject the claim that the Party, or any other institution, could provide a significant counterweight to the power of the dictator in Nazism or Stalinism.
This produced a surprising difference between Nazism and Stalinism: Hitler was generally improving working conditions in Germany. Both were also responsible for massive numbers of needless deaths and the immense suffering and of millions of people either directly or indirectly, and they changed the course of history in significant ways.
For some of us, the answer to this question is uncomfortable, as it was for Winston Churchill in Friedrich and Brzezinski also draw attention to the symbols used by Nazis and Stalinists to represent themselves.
Some of these opponents were executed, while others were imprisoned in concentration camps. Stalinism had an absolute leader, but he was not essential. The book suggests that a familiar claim is wrong: What is the explanation?
Yet the Germans were always less rational than the Soviets about the need to feed their slaves, in order to get useful work out of them. One of the first laws of the Nazi regime mandated the forced sterilization of people suffering from physical handicaps or who had psychiatric conditions deemed to be hereditary.
At the time, the people who ran Britain and some of those who ran America were thoroughly aware of the horrors of Soviet Russia but recognised that its aid was vital to defeat Hitler, not least because no democracy would endure the necessary human sacrifice.
Joseph Stalin now enjoys a bad reputation. Overy makes a simple point which deserves restatement again and again: In particular, it is distinguished by a reliance on modern technology and mass legitimation. The differences stem from the fact that their ideologies were opposed to each other and regarded each other as enemies.
European imperialism of the nineteenth century also paved the way for totalitarianism, by legitimizing the concept of endless expansion. Hannah Arendt[ edit ] Hannah Arendt was one of the first scholars to propose that the regimes of Hitler and Stalin could be grouped in the same political category.
With no way for anyone to express criticism, the dictator has no way of knowing how much support he actually has among the general populace.
When the Stalinist USSR conquered territory, it created smaller copies of itself and installed them as the governments of the occupied countries. A secret police force, for instance, has no reason to exist if there are no dangerous traitors who need to be found.
This is partly due to the way that totalitarian governments arise. Most Germans and Russians persuaded themselves that such madness was not only necessary, but just.
They come about when a militant ideological movement seizes power, so the first leader of a totalitarian government is usually the ideologue who built the movement that seized power, and subsequent leaders try to emulate him.
He was a vastly less effective national leader than Stalin. Both Nazi and Stalinist regimes produced two very different sets of propaganda — one for internal consumption and one for potential sympathizers in other countries.
He begins and ends, of course, by asserting the fundamental doctrinal difference. Totalitarian systems and autocracies[ edit ] The totalitarian paradigm in the comparative study of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union was further developed by Carl Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinskiwho wrote extensively on this topic both individually and in collaboration.
Yet once this distinction has been remarked, similarities between the rival dictatorships become far more striking than their differences. And both regimes would sometimes radically change their propaganda line as they made peace with a former enemy or got into a war with a former ally.
Stalin wanted to fight Germany later rather than sooner, but never doubted the inevitability of a conflict, which makes his disbelief about Barbarossa in June all the more bizarre. The fourth and largest category consisted of ethnic groups that were subject to deportation, famine, or arbitrary arrests under the suspicion of being collectively disloyal to Stalin or to the Soviet state.
A heavily expanded police force could and did tap phones and spy on citizens. This competition to please Hitler was, according to Mommsen, the real cause of Nazi irrationality.A Comparison of Hitler and Stalin Angelica Calvillo HIS Twentieth-Century Europe April 26, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union are two controversial regimes.
Get an answer for 'Compare and contrast the methods of dictatorship used by Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Joseph Stalin.' and find homework help for. Comparing Dictators Adolf Hitler versus Benito Mussolini versus Joseph Stalin Words 7 Pages This essay will compare the three leaders who are famous for their dictatorship and totalitarianism during the 30's decade.
Mao Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler were statistically the most effective mass murderers of the 20th century. The first was probably responsible for most deaths, the last for.
A Comparison of Hitler and Stalin Angelica Calvillo HIS Twentieth-Century Europe April 26, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union are two controversial regimes.
Hitler and Stalin were both Dictators of the countries they ruled. Joseph Stalin. Adolf Hitler. Genocide: If Stalin or Mao killed more people than Hitler, why is Hitler considered the worst? Update Cancel. Answer Wiki.
99 Answers. Srikrishna Chaitanya, Stalin killed more people than Hitler too. C2: Then how come we say Hitler is the most evil person who has ever lived?
C4: Well, there's the human ovens.Download